politalX Politics Store - 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
|
List Price: £9.99
Our Price: £7.42
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Manufacturer: Tree of Life Publications,U.S.
|
Average Customer Rating:  
|
|
Binding: Paperback
Dewey Decimal Number: 973.931
EAN: 9780930852375
ISBN: 0930852370
Label: Tree of Life Publications,U.S.
Manufacturer: Tree of Life Publications,U.S.
Number Of Items: 1
Number Of Pages: 512
Publication Date: 2006-08-01
Publisher: Tree of Life Publications,U.S.
Studio: Tree of Life Publications,U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Pay attention. If you tolerate this your children will be next. Sorry USA; you've been hijacked by Fascists - read on.
Comment: If you believe the Official 9/11 Commission Report then you may be in for a very nasty shock. You need to pay very close attention to this book.
If you have read the Official 9/11 Commission Report and have doubts about it's veracity you should also read this book.
And to all those who realise that gigantic steel-framed skyscrapers don't simply dissolve into dust and debris in 10 seconds flat (sorry again to the 2+2=5 people) because they are damaged and on fire; or 6 seconds in the case of WTC7 - you should get this book to discover the reality of the orchestration and execution of these attacks.
Add to this every other impossibility within the official account of 9/11 and one is faced with incontrovertible evidence of a State-Sponsored False-Flag attack.
Otherwise we can all choose to believe what the Neo-Con/Bush/Cheney regime has told us about 9/11.
Get reading. Then buy or at least see the documentary film entitled "Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11".
Customer Rating:
Summary: Oh how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Comment: Holy Frack!
This is the third book I have read about the events of September 11th, and it is easily the most thought provoking. I picked it up because I have read Webster Tarpley's expose on George Herbert Walker Bush and it was referenced in Jim Marrs 'The Terror Conspiracy'.
Drawing upon past terrorism groups and actions (and their troubling ties to various western intelligence agencies incl NATO Intelligence) - in the domestic US and mainland Europe in the 80's and 90's - Tarpley presents a remakably credible series of events that point to a rogue netwotk inside both US and UK Intelligence agencies as the hand behind 9/11. This is not a conspiracy theory, but careful analysis of the men and beliefs of the hidden arms dealers that saw the light of day during Iran/Contra and other scandals going back to the Bay of Pigs.
Their documented modus operandi is then compared to the horrible and spectacular attacks on the WTC and the very odd strike against the Pentagon (hitting the Army Appropriations Archives no less; perhaps a clue to the $2.3 trillion missing in the Pentagon). The behaviour and very un-islamic habits to the alleged 19 hijackers and their apparent mole-handlers are exposed for all to see while you marvel at the ability of certain FBI and CIA people to stop the warnings from field agents and surveillance to go anywhere.
One of the absolute "hot potatoes" of 9/11 is the fact that there apparently was a threat against the President on Air Force One, and the plotters phoned their threat into the White House with knowledge of daily security codes for both the President and his airplane. For some reason, this prompted an extended telephone conversation between Dick Cheney and President Bush, presumably related to the plotters and their terms. Indeed the power of the rogue network extends into the realm of theronuclear launches which finally explains the hourlong phone conversation between Putin and Bush on that day ; Or least offers the best explanation that I know of when one considers that Bush and Putin met for two days in Kennebunkport some time back and little is known of what they discussed.
This is fascinating yet scary stuff and I honestly hope that some European elected officials, not just those in intelligence who appear to have seen through the official story long ago, read this book so they can make some informed descisions about Bush (both 41 & 43), Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle, John McCone, Doug Feith even Tony Blair et al. These men are not politicians. They are merchants of death who seem to use the work of Leo Strauss, Samuel Huntington and Goebbels to bring about the clash of civilizations.
I'm not saying that Webster Tarpley has all the answers, but the model of of moles and patsies is pretty damned convincing.
The truth will set you free but first it will piss you off. I intend to send this book as a birthday present to several key people in the Danish Government - I think they need it. Do take a look at the reviews on the US Amazon site - it makes for interesting reading.
Customer Rating:
Summary: The very paragon of 9/11
Comment: This is unquestionably the best book to get if you're interested in what definitely seems to be the most coherent interpretation of the *entire* picture of the events of 9/11. You would be well equipped to correctly interpret other 'terrorist incidents' with an understanding of what is said in this book.
The book looks not only in detail at the technical aspects of the event (citing good sources like Professor Steven Jones' paper on his molten metal analysis, or Professor Chossudovsky - an extremely experienced analyst of the 'war on terrorism'), but also at all the other happenings of the day (such as NORAD standing down, the grotesque number of drills, Bush's reaction, etc.). Of particular interest is his thesis that the 'Bush knew' explanation is flawed, because Bush was basically told by others to declare the war of civilisations and invade Afghanistan (this conclusion is logically arrived at).
The mastery of investigation shown in this invaluable book makes other explanations seem incoherent and incomplete. There's also a great deal of background information (all of which is relevant and becoming ever more important in this time of global turmoil - there's no 'dry, dull history' here), especially on al Quaida and the neoconservatives.
I don't think this book is hard going, but it does use quite a few specialised terms - however, I believe this simply demonstrates the author's incredible understanding of every single field relevant to 9/11 (there's even a very interesting, unbiased and reasoned discussion of Bush's psyche).
A note on the author: this guy is an incredibly energetic activist, there's a whole wealth of supporting material to be found on the web on him about current events (e.g. YouTube, Google Video), which together with knowledge of the thesis of '9/11 Synthetic Terror' makes for a very good understanding of the current geopolitical/geostrategic situation.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Final word on false flag terror
Comment: Tarpley provides perhaps the most detailed account of why 9/11 absolutley was an inside job. This is as close as you will get to an academic disection of those terrible events. The evidence is exhaustive.
Tarpley first of all provides damning proof of concept with his analysis of a known state-sponsored terror cell - Operation Gladio. Operation Gladio provides documented proof that western governments (mainly Uk & USA through NATO) carried out assassinations and attacks on trains and school buses. This subdues the "I can't believe our government would..." reaction before it has time to take root.
The one piece of evidence that is difficult to debunk are the sheer number of drills and exercises which mirrored the real plot. Tarpley hypothesises that these drills are a cover for the real plot. Only small changes are necessary for the atack to "go live."
Why were the hijackers trained on US military bases?
Why did NORAD stand down?
What did hit the Pentagon?
How can 3 steel-framed buildings all collapse at free-fall speed without having been rigged with explosives?
9/11 was an inside job!
Customer Rating: 
Summary: The history and ideology of false-flag terrorism
Comment: 9/11 Synthetic Terror is an interesting read from Webster Griffin Tarpley. It covers a range of material, from previous examples of false flag or synthetic terrorism, such as the strategy of tension in Italy, to bilateral US-Russian relations; from psychoanalysis of George W. Bush, to the effect of 9/11 on the dollar and global capitalism generally.
From this brief description, the reader can tell that this book has more in common with Mike Ruppert's Crossing the Rubicon than it has with David Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor (though Tarpley's book does have a discussion of the evidence from that day - how WTC1, 2 and 7 collapsed, why weren't the planes intercepted, what hit the Pentagon, were the alleged hijackers competent enough to pilot the planes et cetera).
Whereas Ruppert's book attempts to place the terrorist attacks of 11th September, 2001, within a global drugs-and-Wall Street nexus, Tarpley frames the issues within a historical context of state-sponsored terrorism, where characters such as Osama Bin Laden et al are reduced to the elements of patsies, framed by a rogue network of military and intelligence officials.
Whilst some aspects of this book are fascinating and well written, such as the ideological forefathers of the current generation of neoconservatives, how the likes of Leo Strauss influenced Paul Wolfowitz, for example, some chapters of this book are shockingly badly written, with allegations piled upon allegations and all with evidence of a very scant nature. Indeed, the evidence that Bin Laden is a stooge of the Central Intelligence Agency, the very bedrock of the book, is never really established at all, accept from that it fits in with the author's ideology.
Again, Like Mike Ruppert's book, 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism is in need of serious editing - minor errors abound, from people's names being misspelt to the S.A.S. being referred to as the Secret Air Services (not Special), to the S.A.S. being heavily Scottish-controlled (no evidence that it is but even if it were true, so what), to having its offices located in London and not Hereford. Like Crossing the Rubicon, chapters of the book are chaotic, with seemingly random paragraphs just dropped in that never seem to have an apparent structure ie introduction, body of evidence, conclusion.
Taken as a whole, however, on balance Tarpley's work has enough going for it to recommend it to readers (some chapters are superb, with much fascinating information), though I would not suggest it being the first purchase for either the general reader or those new to the 9/11 debate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
